Adam Marsland here. Long time lurker, first time poster. I've asked Ric Capucho to post on my behalf since the board doesn't seem to want to let me register.
Been following the recent posts with interest. I smiled at seeing the word "conspiracy" thrown around as I know that's partially directed at me. It's true I no longer believe Bill is to be found in the park, but it's not simply because we haven't found him - it's absolutely true that any of us could have walked right past him (though his clothing and pack should be conspicuous). That's not the point. Taking all the information together, including his initial disappearance, the geography and topography, the location and timing of the ping, and what I've seen myself on the ground, I just cannot make a lost hiker scenario fit the facts as I now understand them - at least not without squinting and doing some serious pretzel motions. And as some outdated pages on my website will attest, I sure have tried!
Now, Occam's Razor does not mean the simplest explanation should be presumed right. It just means it should be tested first; and that's what's been done. Tom and others still believe the lost hiker scenario is far more likely than another explanation, which is totally fair. I've weighed the same evidence and come to a different conclusion, for now -- new information may change my thinking just as it has in the past, and I can't prove anything (nor do I care to). No one wants to be the first person to go with an idea that seems kooky, and this is a hiking/S & R board, so I get the resistance to another explanation. But if there's an alternate scenario where all the facts line up straight and make sense, I will lean toward that, even if it doesn't jibe with conventional wisdom. If new facts come in, then that may change the picture yet again. It's a process.
At any rate, that wasn't my reason for coming on here. Bottom line is I could easily be wrong (and if I'm right there's not much to talk about) and no one knows for sure what happened. A number of folks have recently posted with new ideas and asked for suggestions about where to look. I wanted to contribute and add a few bits of information.
RichardK - your idea of Bill wandering around in a fog up California Riding and Hiking Trail makes perfect sense - that had occurred to me too. It makes less sense to have him turn into Upper Covington, but I suppose it's possible. But I can't see any possible way that he then wandered into the badlands west of there in that condition. I've gone all up and down the west side of Upper Covington looking for easy ways in and there just aren't any. On the very few semi-OK entry points I soon encountered pathways that were so choked with brush and rockfall that I had to turn back. No way a dazed semi-conscious hiker just wanders in there absent-mindedly. It's just not possible; you'd fall on your head almost immediately. If Bill did get into the badlands, he had to have been somewhat ambulatory and conscious enough to have gotten over some real obstacles (but crazy enough to enter in the first place). I think Tom would also vouch for that - he's gotten further into that hellhole than I have. Now once you're down at the bottom, there's a honking big canyon wash that runs all the way to Sky Valley and that'd probably make an interesting trek if someone wanted to try it. Early on I thought that's where Bill went, but after checking out the approaches I changed my mind pretty fast.
Hikin' Jim, for a while I was thinking much as you do - that Bill was trying to cram in as much hiking time as possible while he was there and went too far. However, Bill's fiancé was kind enough to share some information and according to her, Bill was going to be in JTNP all week, and was planning to do a series of short hikes. So he didn't actually need to make a big hike happen that one day. Bill would have been on his second hike of the day, most likely having gone to Lost Horse first, as Tom already indicated.
So if we exclude those wacko conspiracy theories, in terms of where to look, I basically agree with Tom and Myth -- between Quail Mountain and Smith Water Canyon. (In response to the question about a map, I did map out the known possible ping spots here:
http://www.adammarsland.com/ewasko3.html)
The way the current cell info appears, there seems to be (to me) only two plausible places for the ping to have occurred - on the extreme west end of Upper Covington (Tom is skeptical that this is a Serin tower area, but I am pretty confident about it), or one low ridge area on the south side of Smith Water Canyon at approximately 34° 2'5.20"N, 116°15'47.32"W.
Both Tom and I visited this latter spot within a day of each other, and it has a lot going for it: it is the only place along SWC close enough to the 10.6 mile line (and to Smith Water) to seemingly be in the running, and it is an area with strong reception which lies just north of a low ridge; in other words, it's conceivable that Bill could have been in a dark cell zone up to this point, crossed over the ridge, suddenly came into a strong reception area and crashed the battery (one of the puzzles with the cell ping being on the south side of SWC is how Bill got there without pinging earlier, since there's a lot of reception between there and Quail Mountain; also why the cell only connected for only 10 seconds). I call this the "magic bullet" spot.
There are a number of nagging problems with this scenario but let's just go with it.
Now, from this vantage, Bill can easily see Yucca Valley, and he may be able to see Park Road. So the way out from there - north or east - is clear to him. If he did ping the phone here, I would guess one of two things happened:
1. He tried to climb down to the east, towards and above Quail Springs (the north descent into SWC has been thoroughly covered by searchers, including me, and I don't think he's there). The descent towards Quail Springs looks easy but gets progressively worse as you go along, and it's easy to imagine cliffing out - I've nearly done it a few times. This area sucks. It's been looked at a lot both physically and through binoculars and photos, but I'm sure there's a few spots no one's gotten to. I know the times I've been through I was more focused on not breaking my neck. It would be great to swarm that small sector if it wasn't so darn dangerous.
2. There was apparently a search helicopter above Quail Mountain at around 9 a.m. Sunday morning, roughly 2 1/2 hours after the ping. If Bill was still in the ping area (and it's a nice place to hang out and wait for help), he have may seen the helicopter and backtracked south towards it, explaining why he wasn't found where the phone presumably pinged. Ric Capucho first suggested this scenario, and it still makes logical sense. This area has not been searched as much as the area around the 10.6 radius.
If I was going to go back, those are the places I would look. The timeline, distances, cell reception patterns and topography still make it hard to understand, but if Bill was eventually found in one of these areas I wouldn't die of shock.
Any place else just bristles with too many improbabilities to me. Upper Covington looked promising, but he just doesn't seem to be there and unlike SWC, the terrain in UC is pretty benign until you get into the badlands, and given that he should have seen Eureka Peak Road on the way in I have a very hard time believing he would have risked it. There is a spot both Myth and I looked at between Upper and Lower Covington, but it's so close to the road and UC trailhead, and just high and far enough to make me skeptical he would have gone up there to get a call out or to cool off - and a ranger was in the area very shortly after the phone went off. Plus we looked and didn't find him.
Hope this contributes to the conversation...it's a fascinating mystery.
Adam Marsland