Ken, you're absolutely right that a life without risk is no life at all. We don't want to lead totally sanitized lives and it's understandable that some people react against our overly controlled and corporatized lives with forays into extreme sports.
But, on the other hand, quite frankly I see extreme sports as really being very much entwined with late-stage capitalism. Participation in extreme sports is as much as way of asserting your economic status as owning race horses was for Victorian gentleman. It's a way of bragging about how much money/leisure one has and a primitive way of expressing macho dominance. We don't see anyone in Somalia jumping off cliffs in wingsuits nor do we see factory workers in Bangladesh engaging in mountaineering treks (though there's a good chance they may have sewn some of the clothes worn by hikers.) It's crucial to have wilderness experiences just to keep our sanity, but the energy some people put into 'extreme' or dangerous pursuits is, I think, essentially egoistic, and it's better devoted to helping those less well off just attain bearable lives. After all, teaching girls in Afghanistan to read is far more risky than climbing Everest. It's just much less glamorous.
But getting back on topic to Skyline--my concern is not with experienced hikers who know Skyline well and choose to risk hiking it during summer months. That's their business and choice. My concern is with the ignorant--the people who don't understand how dangerous it is. Those are the ones we see getting rescued or killed. My fear is that sooner or later they will get a SAR person killed as well.
