Rick F wrote:Skyline is already an established use trail.
For what it's worth, I believe Skyline is a constructed trail not a use trail. The Works Progress Administration/Civilian Conservation Corps during the great depression improved a previously existing (if my memory serves me here). You are correct that no public agency maintains the trail today (that I am aware of).
My take is this: If cairns help
preserve an area, I'm generally for them. If cairns serve only to to confuse and clutter, then I am against them.
Case in point of preservation:
When I first started taking the Sid Davis Route some years ago, there really wasn't a clear trail. There were "braids" branching out here and there, cutting all over. The route has now consolidated into something that is now (in many stretches) every bit as much of a trail as any official trail on the mountain. I'm glad all the branches are now more consolidated, and if a couple of "ducks" (small cairns basically) strategically placed help prevent little branch trails going all over the place, then I'm for them.
Case in point of confuse and clutter:
One time, coming down from Marion Mountain, going west toward Wellmans Cienenga, I saw cairns all over heck and back. There was neither rhyme nor reason to them. God only knows what they marked, and they appeared to have been set by different persons at different times marking their own personal routes. THESE CAIRNS HAVE NO PLACE ON THE MOUNTAIN. Heck, if Hal wants to kick those down, I'd join him. What visual clutter! It's really de-wildernessification. Yes, I know that's not really a word, but by that I mean that a wilderness is hardly a wilderness if there are sign posts every 10 feet. Yes, I know it's not 1749. Yes, I know I'm not the first Caucasian to ever tread foot in the San Jacs, but for crying out loud I don't need modernity to be rubbed in my face. I'd at least like a wilderness area to appear, well, wildernessy.
HJ