RichardK wrote:I have never been to SWC. The pictures I have seen show water in standing pools where animals would be at it. Is there any drinkable water in SWC like a spring flowing from a rock face? If the only water available needs treatment (boiling, filtering, iodine), did Bill carry such equipment? It seems unlikely for a desert hike if he wasn't planning on a refill.
SWC has some water, but think stagnant standing pools and slow seeps, not clear trickling springs. If desperately thirsty, it would be a welcome oasis, but you better get yourself back to civilization before the side effects kick in.
Since Bill didn't register cell pings after his calls, I assume that his cell was turned off until he needed it, and by that time he was out of coverage.
Unless you do specific research, I don't know that you'd know how rugged SWC's slopes can be. Most travels is down in the wash, not coming down the slopes. There are safe places to descend. But you need to have the time to look for them and go down slowly. A simple misstep or stumble can cause you to come to grief quickly, depending on where you are.
The topo lines are stacked in places - a clear warning - but a Google satellite view - or Google Earth - makes the terrain look deceptively benign. A trip or two into the area and you begin to learn what to watch for.
With careful route planning, or a bit of luck, you can avoid dangerous scrambles. And then again, you could cliff out, too. My rule for travel in this area is to never drop down a descent I cannot easily get back up. Not even if the next descent down merely looks easy. Unless it is a drop down onto obvious open and easy terrain, I go around. And this is with a companion! Going alone, I'd be even more cautious. Of course, that is speaking from hindsight.
Ric Capucho wrote:If Bill willingly headed to SWC with his phone switched off, then that infers that the emergency came later, most likely during the dangerous descent into SWC when he'd reentered mobile phone coverage shadow. So why on earth would Bill willingly head for SWC without an emergency? He can read a map (most likely read it intimately, given his recon background), use a compass, and feel the temperature. And he knows he's heading away from his airconditioned car.
I wouldn't underestimate the lure of adventure, or the power of underestimation. Standing on Quail peak, SWC looks … kinda close. The desert can be like a telephoto lens. Distances are flattened due to the general lack of obvious landmarks. Things look close that aren't.
Also, even though Bill did go in July, the first day of his outing wasn't particularly hot. On 6/27, when he was reported overdue, the high was 89F - the infamous "dry" heat to boot. And if he did ascend to Quail Mountain, he would have encountered temperatures several degrees cooler at higher elevation. The low was 57 on that day. Additionally, the area between Quail Mountain and SWC is usually windy. Setting out for SWC can look like a great idea under such circumstances.
If it wasn't for that cell ping, I would consider everything between Quail and SWC fair game. Especially the bottoms of the washes.
And yet, people are capable of more than we give them credit for. On OtherHand's web page there are two such examples - the Death Valley Germans covered a lot of ground in averse circumstances, and Mr. Norman Cox also covered more ground than was initially thought plausible.
Without knowing exactly what Bill took with him - apart from "3 bottles of water" - what size? 500ml? A liter? A quart? A gallon? and some snacks we don't know - we don't really know what he could have thought himself capable of.
My feeling is that he had conceived of a grand adventure, and it went wrong for him. This is mostly based on the fact that I have done my share of stumbling though almost invisible acacias in deep dusk after biting off more than I could chew, trotting uneasily down paths with the wrath of those I told I'd be back hours ago on my mind, and collapsing, spent, in a tent after exhausting myself to roll back miles that I took on when I was still bushy-tailed and eager.
climbant wrote:With so little facts we all could go on for hours about possibilities. As a firefighter/paramedic for over 10 years I know cell phone pings are pretty unreliable, not horribly off, but off, and I've had plenty that are very off. If Bill's phone was damaged prior to the ping can that effect the accuracy, maybe a lot?
My experience with cell pings come from being a dev with an IT group that developed vehicle tracking software. One gross inaccuracy could come from "tower jumps" where a position is established via triangulation, and if towers A, B and C give you a ping for position, and then on the next round towers B, C, and D pinged, you get quite a big jump in location. But in this case, only one tower was involved, Serin Drive. From that I would guess - GUESS - that the distance reported was pretty accurate. I've found the distance from the towers to be the most accurate component. Of course, in this case we have no direction for the ping, and reflection could have played a role in exaggerating the distance.
But I tend to trust the distance reported, even as I wonder how to make sense of it. Extrapolating from there, I would trust the general limit of SWC and its southern slope as a reasonable area to search. It makes sense, except that Bill haven't been found, yet.
I discovered plenty of predator activity in SWC on my most recent trip there. I hasten to add that I don't suggest Bill ran into a predator - but I do wonder whether predator or scavenger activity could have some bearing on the current location and state of his remains and thus on the difficulty of finding him.
If I recall the incident report correctly, the only items we know he had with him would be:
- Daypack, possibly black
- 3 bottles of water
- Some salami snacks and apples
- cell phone
- clothing
- presumably also rental car keys and wallet. I don't recall mention being made of his wallet being left in the rental car. I always leave my wallet in my vehicle ( weight, ahem ) when I head off to a desert hike, and I do think "Well, I should take SOME identification in case someone ever has to stumble across my remains in the backcountry" but I never do take it!
All of these items except the snacks should have survived conditions to date. None of them are easy to spot unless you are pretty close to it.
I'd hike in a bright yellow or orange shirt in the desert, except I've had issues with bees mistaking me for nutrition before. So I stick to sand-colored or grey garments and hope for the best!
Oh, and I carry a PLB. May I never need to use it.
One other thought - this area of JTNP isn't particularly remote. At least, it doesn't feel that way to me. You get clear views of surrounding civilization from multiple points in this area, even if that civilization is actually quite distant if you consider walking there. There is a good amount of traffic through SWC, though probably not in summer. The area south of SWC gets its share of backcountry explorers - I happen upon footprints in all odd corners of the park, and a bit of Googling turn up numerous hiking club organized hikes in the area. Yet, the terrain is easier to traverse in some ways than others. For instance, seeking shelter under a cliff or jumble of boulders may put you outside an easy traverse and thus much less likely to be found later on.