by lilbitmo » Mon May 13, 2013 1:26 pm
I've been reading the post about this "short cut" problem for years on this board and some others. I've been on that trail many times and it's not clear what the true trial is, it's not maintained and recognized by any agency that I'm aware of, it's just a trail that was set up by use and continued use and over the years different people have taken different versions of that up different routes.
While I agree taking a steep descent is more likely to get one hurt than taking a flat one or one with less steepness will help someone navigate a safer return to the trail head. I don't agree that people are all about cutting shortcuts just to be "one-upping" the next guy to post TR about their amazing time. It's like being on the freeway, you see an open lane and there's someone moving slowly in front of you, you change lanes to maintain your speed, that other lane is there because it was set up and everyone uses it. Don's misunderstand me at some point people did make shortcuts, but that's implying that the original trail was set up by an organization that wanted everyone to follow the same path, lacking that it was a game trail and it's my experience that game trials move and take the whatever course the animal felt like taking.
Lacking actual evidence that you have a sanctioned trail that is maintained and easily describable means that we are implying that everyone other than us does not know the true direction/course of the trail and that they are causing harm to both the trail and those attempting to use it - I find that unrealistically blaming people for the wrong issue. The real issue is to set up the actual trail once and for all with the help of the governing body that controls that section of land.
While most trails in California are set up for what trail builders call "Boy Scout Grade" (less than 6%) this trail is not, because by chance it was a "game trail" that continues to evolve based on all the different users. This trail is very challenging, it has sections that are quite steep, there are alternatives to those sections by starting at the other trail head.
For all we know the sections that are steep could have been the original trail, we don't know that unless we were there when the trail originated, so that means that you could be the one "short cutting" on the less steep sections because someone with less skills decided to take a less steep route sometime in the past, thus setting up a new direction or choice on the trail.
What's more important is that another man lost his life for reasons that will become clear when as Sam said the coroner finish's the autopsy. My condolences go out to the family of Mark Alexander, it's tragic when someone dies doing what they love.
Pointing fingers at "short cuts" implies the wrong message here. Being prepared for the conditions, knowing when to call for help, knowing that the people you are with (if you are not alone, nothing can be done about being alone) will help you and not let you go back down alone is far more important than focusing on the conditions of a trail that has never truly had a "real trail" marked or considered by authorities as the true "trail".
Skyline has had some serious fatalities over the years, some years multiple deaths, it's a fact that the major portion of them are from hikers going up in the heat and turning around thus complicating the problem and succumbing to the heat.
If you think making the trail "The Trail" will stop that from happening it will not. You will get a more "aesthetic" trail, yes there will be less damage but that's going to take an very organized effort to put all the pieces in place.
I think it's more productive to put more water emergency boxes on that trail, maybe an emergency phone line or something of that nature and even a water pipe up to the picnic tables so that those in trouble on the way down could have water like the DWA provides in Snow Creek for the PCT'ers that are coming down from Fuller Ridge. They could also build a small shade shelter at the picnic tables.
I for one would love to see the trail maintained and a proper one designated but focusing on that as a way of diverting ones own responsibility to offset a tragedy to me is wrong.
I don't use Skyline often because I'm one of those people that overheat when the temperature is above 70 degrees, for that reason I choose other trails and even on days when it's under 70 I feel the effects if I attempt to go up to quickly, on your trail or the one that I'm following at the time as at this point I'm still not sure which one "is the trail". Taking the less steep one still can overheat someone if they are not properly hydrated, have not had proper sleep, it's a clear day versus a cloudy day, it all depends on the physiology of that person on that day.
We need to focus on deterring people from going up in the heat when their bodies just cannot handle it and if they still choose to go, to give them a chance to save themselves from the mistake that they've made, not point fingers at anyone that might have changed the course of a "non-maintained trail" over the years, this is just my humble opinion and I'm hoping that if you are a constant user of that trail that it's at the point that you want to change things once and for all and find a way to make a trail that is maintained and stop putting out that that is why people are dying on that trail, that's not the case. More importantly find ways to save people from themselves as even the healthiest of people had died on that trail from the heat.
God Bless and stay safe out there.