guest wrote:The origin of this thread was referring to 2 tourist on a corp. 'junket" which offered a short time at the top of the tram.
I've been involved with many of these, although these are supervised, and the one in this case was not, at least not down in the forest, which was a error.
To assume all people out for a short hike, or to reguire anyone hiking in the immediate area of the tram, or other tourist type areas to have 3 electronic devises is unrealistic, cost prohibitive for many, and the resources to manage, monitor and police it, don't exist. This topic has been discussed in detail previously on this board.
Many of us in this area that have hiked in these wilderness for decades, don't carry these, that's our right, you can call us what ever you like, but there's more than one way to survive in the wilderness. To mandate this attitude of big brother on everyone, because some people believe it's THE WAY to saves lives, is, in my opinion, similar to demanding everyone get vaccinated for any possible illness, when it's my right to refuse.
It is a good idea, and is now required, I believe, in rugged areas, tough terrain prone to severe weather, where rescue's are common.
I agree that these devises can be a big help in many situations, but they also can give people a false sense of security, and, as we've seen, allow people to "Call of Help", as soon as their hot coco runs out. Then, many of the SAR's go out to "rescue" them, at great cost & risk. Yes, some that were prepared get in trouble or get injured or lost, but many, like the yahoo who's been rescued 3 TIMES in the San Jacinto's, cause some SAR's volunteers to finally quit.
The 2 folks who survived did what they could to survive, and they did a pretty good job, (although the forest could have been burned heavily).
They must have had good Karma to find John Donovan's pack, (and yes, maybe he might have been rescued if he had one of these devises), but who knows, some people are extremely hard-headed and what to get out on their own, so attempt the dangerous, instead of pushing the button for help.
Several posters on this thread, (some members of SAR's) did a great job of explaining how easy it can be for tourists or 1 time visitors on a casual hike to get in trouble.
Happy hiking,
ss
1. To suggest that everyone carry a celfone and a gps reciever with them when they leave their home is niether unreasonable, nor cost-prohibitive. My smartphone has a GPS app on it, and I NEVER leave my home without my celfone, even to go a block to the grocery store.
2. A Garmin GPS reciever is about $50 on ebay, and it is small and lightweight, so once again I disagree with you that it is expensive.
3. I purchased a Personal Locator Beacon on ebay 2 years ago for $98 It weighs about a pound or so. Once again, NOT expensive, nor bulky nor bothersome to carry.
4. How is it "big brother" to carry these devices ? In general, the government is not tracking your celfone moment by moment, nor is the government even aware you are carrying a PLB with you until you activate it. And you ONLY activate it in an immediate life-threatening EMERGENCY. And if you DO activate your PLB for a rescue, you DO want some government action there to save your life, don't you ? So please explain how that is "big brotherism". (And btw, I'm a Libertarian, and a STRONG supporter of the Second Amendment, if you get what I mean).
And since you believe that it is easy "for tourists or 1 time visitors on a casual hike to get in trouble", then ALL THE MORE REASON to ALWAYS carry a celfone AND a gps reciever, and if you go hiking, camping, or into a wilderness area, ALWAYS carry a PLB.
Your arguments against doing so are nonsensical and put people's life in danger if they follow your foolish advice.
A celfone, GPS reciever, and a PLB, are all lightweight, and all TOGETHER cost less than $200. Is a human life NOT worth more than $200 ? !
If you leave your home without a celfone and GPS reciever on your person, and a PLB in your vehicle, and if you do not carry these 3 items with you when you venture even the smallest distance from civilization, then you are an IDIOT. And if you wind up in a life-threatening situation because of your foolishness, then you will get NO SYMPATHY from me, nor should you get it from anyone else.
Are we all not supposed to be safety-conscious FIRST ? !
And once again, I did not say, nor mean to imply, that these 3 items are the ONLY things you should carry with you when venturing out into the wilderness.
There is NO reason not to carry these 3 near-miraculous small electronic devices with you at all times when away from civilization since they are for SAFETY and could possibly SAVE THE LIFE of you, or a companion.
Daniel P. Hanover