Motorized transporters in the San Jac WILDERNESS

General Palm Springs area.

Motorized transporters in the San Jac WILDERNESS

Postby Florian » Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:51 pm

Does anyone know what the deal is with those gas powered "transporters" they're using between Long Valley and Round Valley? I can maybe understand a one time special use to bring in supplies but this is the second year they're using them. This is a wilderness and that means NO vehicles. And certainly not something that leaves tracks like a tank all over the mtn. The round-about route they take near the High Trail is ugly, obtrusive, and offensive. With dayglo flagging all along the way too. Like the route isn't obvious. And just what work has this crew been doing anyway? I've seen no trail improvement except they're redoing the trail near the ranger station in Long Valley AGAIN. That section was just redone a year or two ago. Seeing those tank tracks up there is really starting to piss me off. That and the camp established at Round Valley sounded like a cement mixer or some other large motorized device was running all day yesterday.

-Florian
User avatar
Florian
 
Posts: 1441
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 4:49 pm
Location: Palm Springs

Postby Andy » Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:54 pm

Florian, I agree with you that its an eye/ear sore. My only guess is that this work is under the states jurisdiction whereas other wilderness areas in the national forests are Federal, each defining "wilderness" in their own way? Most Federal wildernesses don't operate trams and sell cold beer... although, at times I kinda wish some did :wink:
Andy
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: Temecula

Postby Hikin_Jim » Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:10 pm

Andy wrote:Florian, I agree with you that its an eye/ear sore. My only guess is that this work is under the states jurisdiction whereas other wilderness areas in the national forests are Federal, each defining "wilderness" in their own way? Most Federal wildernesses don't operate trams and sell cold beer... although, at times I kinda wish some did :wink:
A Federally designated wilderness is a federally designated wilderness no matter which agency has jurisdiction. The tram is outside the boundary; the wilderness boundary is where you cross the creek and start going up the switchbacks en route to Round Valley).

To have all that machinery inside the wilderness, they had to apply for and have granted some kind of waiver. Supposedly, they're "restoring" :roll: the meadow.

HJ
Backpacking stove reviews and information:  Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby halhiker » Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:16 pm

Hikin_Jim wrote:
Andy wrote:Florian, I agree with you that its an eye/ear sore. My only guess is that this work is under the states jurisdiction whereas other wilderness areas in the national forests are Federal, each defining "wilderness" in their own way? Most Federal wildernesses don't operate trams and sell cold beer... although, at times I kinda wish some did :wink:
A Federally designated wilderness is a federally designated wilderness no matter which agency has jurisdiction. The tram is outside the boundary; the wilderness boundary is where you cross the creek and start going up the switchbacks en route to Round Valley).

To have all that machinery inside the wilderness, they had to apply for and have granted some kind of waiver. Supposedly, they're "restoring" :roll: the meadow.

HJ


The State Park wilderness is not a federally designated wilderness. It is a State Park. I noticed those tracks and think they look terrible. I certainly hope they return the area to its original state.

To me it is quite hypocritical of the Park managers to restrict people's access to a certain unique area of the mountain and then tear the crap out of the rest of it in the name of preservation.

We certainly have some very interesting land managers in our area.
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Postby Ed » Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:36 am

Whatever they are doing, I would be 90% or more certain they received a special grant of funds to do it.

I know that some people disagree, but I find our land managers in general to be secretive and arrogant. Their wilderness permit system, for example, is unbelievably archaic, labor and paper intensive, user unfriendly, and not even consistent for different ranger stations for the same wilderness area or land manager.

If they have money to spend, they ought to use it to reopen trails that have been closed by private landowners, such as the Coldwater Trail on Santiago Peak, or the Falls Creek Trail on San Gorgonio. These trails were open to the public for decades when traffic on trails in Southern California was a small fraction of what it is now, and crossed private land for only a short stretch. It is hard to believe that the public land managers could not have prevented the closures, or could not reopen them now, through some combination of legal action and negotiation.

By the way, speaking of secretive land managers, does anyway know whether or not the Vivian Creek Trail is open yet? I can't find out from any source on the Internet, and it is a 3 hour drive for me.
Last edited by Ed on Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ed
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: San Diego Area

Postby Sally » Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:35 pm

Hi Florian - We saw the "tank" being pushed next to the trail on our way to Hidden Divide a couple of weeks ago. It really did make a mess of the terrain adjacent to the trail.

Hi Ed - I just got a permit to do Vivian Creek Trail this Wednesday.

I agree that the wilderness permit system is out of whack. Even if I show up at the Mill Creek ranger station station at 4:45 on a Wednesday morning most of the slots for most trails are empty. I doubt that that many people have beat me to it by 4:45 AM! And we usually don't see anyone on the trail on Wednesdays either!
User avatar
Sally
 
Posts: 1125
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Temecula

Postby Ed » Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:30 am

Sally,

Thanks for the information. Look forward to your trip report.
Ed
 
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: San Diego Area

Postby Patrick » Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:45 pm

Sally wrote:I agree that the wilderness permit system is out of whack. Even if I show up at the Mill Creek ranger station station at 4:45 on a Wednesday morning most of the slots for most trails are empty. I doubt that that many people have beat me to it by 4:45 AM! And we usually don't see anyone on the trail on Wednesdays either!


Last time that I went into MCRS, they told me that they aren't really putting permits out anymore.

I dont know if thats true or not. Everyone that was in there was a new volunteer.
Patrick
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:28 pm

Postby thatoneguy » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:07 pm

The CCC is working on many different projects all over MTSJ. They are making many improvments and once they are finished they will leave no trace. I think they will be around for a few more years.
thatoneguy
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 9:42 am

Postby phydeux » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:04 am

Since the State is in such a fiscal bind, maybe they're trying to put in 'improvements' that'll include corporate sponsorships. Can't you just envision getting to the summit and enjoying a nice cup of coffee and a bran muffin at the revamped summit hut? :wink:

Image
3 of the 5 voices in my head are telling me to "Go for it!"
User avatar
phydeux
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Orange County, CA.

Next

Return to Mt. San Jacinto & Santa Rosa Mountains

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests