Yesterday on Skyline, I encountered a group at the picnic tables who had hiked Devil's Slide last weekend and were doing their first C2C. I asked how much water they were carrying. They told me 3L, which I promptly told them probably too little for even just Skyline with the current temps, let alone a full C2C. I also told them that if anything happened, don't try to head back down - the rise in temps would get them in far more trouble. We passed them around 6500' - they looked like they were struggling, but they weren't in trouble. We also passed a guy who's leg was cramping up and his GF was massaging it and a couple of other guys who had left at 2:30am and admitted the hike was *much* harder then they had expected. We wound up sharing a cab with them back to the museum. As far as I know, none of these people died or had to be rescued.
My point is, that while Skyline is dangerous, the number of people who die or need to be rescued is a very small percentage of those who attempt it. The tone of this thread (at least initially) was contrary to this fact. And I feel that makes it misleading.
cynthia23 wrote:I am NOT making the point that no one can do Skyline on a high-temp day; I've done it myself, several times, in June, July, and August. Yes, if you leave early enough and move quickly, you will experience no temps higher than eighty degrees, and the hike is unpleasant, but perfectly doable. THAT WASN"T my point.
I know that wasn't your point, but until this reply, you NEVER said that. In fact, you implied exactly the opposite. And that's my point. If you mislead people, they are less likely to pay attention to what you have to say, even when what you have to say could *really* help them. And to zip's point, going beyond just informing people and to the extreme of TELLING them what they can and can't do (take this thread's title as an example), you further risk alienating people. People who would otherwise really benefit from the valuable information that you and others could provide.
I think your story about getting food poisoning and making the decision to try to hike back down is far better served as an example of how even experienced people can get in trouble and make mistakes. You don't have to take it any further than that. Smart people are going to learn from your experience and be better prepared. Others aren't going to listen to you anyway, no matter what you have to say.
IMO, the best approach here is to give people as much information as possible - the more, the better - and let them utilize that info to make their decision. Emphasize the additional risks involved with high temperatures. But also emphasize the dozens of OTHER risks that exist, no matter what the temperature is like. Skyline is a difficult hike, and the more people know about what they are getting into, the better off they are going to be, even if they don't need to be rescued.