by cynthia23 » Fri May 27, 2011 10:38 pm
Let's hope you're right, but I don't think so, Skunkboy. I greatly magnified the pix and then linked up to Google Earth with the original pix side by side for comparison, and followed the trail (it's not easy, but one can follow it fairly closely. Also, people have posted pix of various sites of the trail, and that helps. ) The two areas do seem to intersect. it looks to me that the area is about 3800 to 4000 up, and that it's the part of the trail that goes all the way to the southernmost part of the ridge, directly above Tahquitz. Also: 1. the tribe already has all of the canyon itself, 2. the body of the ad described the land as 'mountainous terrain 5 miles W of Palm springs' which would not describe areas in lower Tahquitz Canyon, and 3. from how I read the pix itself, wherever on the mountain the land is, it definitely appears (at least to me) to be on the face of the mountain ... not down in the canyon. You can see the sharp descent of the ridge with the increase in greenery. Also, note the two tiny white dots--those are the Tahquitz Canyon water storage tanks. They will help in reading the picture.
Still, I'm no expert, so I'm hoping others will weigh in here with their views. We need some (military?) people who can read aerial photos better than I can. It could be that the parcel is only on the upper slopes of Tahquitz and doesn't contain any sections of the trail. Unfortunately, the original pix is small. So, people? Where is this parcel?
Q: How many therapists does it take to screw in a light bulb? A: Only one, but the light bulb has to want to change ...