Perry wrote:I can't have much of an opinion because I've been out of the loop these days, but I do think it's a bad idea to post future trip dates and/or walk right in front of the caretaker's house. It's possible they aren't "gestapo" but just doing their jobs and don't want to face criticism from people who might ask, "Why are you letting people trespass?" (so blatantly).
I tried to delete my old Snow Creek photos. Geocities closed, but strangely they keep my site up and won't let me edit it.

Whether it can be done legally without getting severely cut up on bushes...thoughts?
It does strike me that Snow Creek has become very popular and is the subject of many posts on various message boards, including trip reports with lots of wonderful pictures. Given that the DWA people do not want anyone crossing their square mile, all of this hoopla is pretty obviously a direct challenge to them. There may have been a tendency to overlook activity in the past, or at least not go to much effort to enforce the ban. But rapidly increasing use is too much of a challenge to ignore. So, trouble has been brewing for a long time.
At the other end, there must be lots of talk about illegal climbs, many rescues, etc. And that talk must include pressure on State Park people to enofrce their permit policy at the San Jacinto summit. So, trouble has been brewing there too.
On the other hand, the harassment outside of DWA land recently does invite terms like "goons" or, for the more hyperbolic, "Gestapo" and "SS." That should generate protests.
A truly legal route is one obvious solution, but it is still of limited value if permits are not issued and rules are enforced to the letter upstairs on the summit.
I hope that this all gets resolved in favor of climbing.