Built for distance

Southern California and far-away places. Hiking, wildlife, cycling etc.

Built for distance

Postby halhiker » Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:05 pm

An interesting article from the NY Times about how humans were built for distance running. This should be encouraging for those crazy folks planning the back to back.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/27well.html

p.s. I need to get some of those sandals. :D
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Built for Distance

Postby neverwashasbeen » Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:07 am

Hal, I can get you some of those sandals, but they're going to be very expensive. :)
User avatar
neverwashasbeen
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 6:34 am
Location: Palm Springs

Postby » Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:55 pm

i was reading that article (and leaving comments) a few days ago. interesting stuff.

unfortunately there's not much science on it. and really its not like humans were meant to run on concrete for 26 miles barefoot (or in shoes). and as fast as possible.

1 skyline (~ a marathon) is much better than running 26 miles. you can get up and do it a again the next day. most marathoners can't do that.

of course having a tram makes a big difference. take advantage of it (like some of you do :D )
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:41 pm

Another interesting story in the same vein.

Postby halhiker » Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:35 pm

Here's another interesting story on basically the same thing about how and why humans ENJOY running and endurance activities:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... 2&f=510221
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Postby halhiker » Sat Oct 31, 2009 4:39 pm

Zé wrote:i was reading that article (and leaving comments) a few days ago. interesting stuff.

unfortunately there's not much science on it. and really its not like humans were meant to run on concrete for 26 miles barefoot (or in shoes). and as fast as possible.

1 skyline (~ a marathon) is much better than running 26 miles. you can get up and do it a again the next day. most marathoners can't do that.

of course having a tram makes a big difference. take advantage of it (like some of you do :D )


I don't know much about the science of the whole thing but there was one quibble I had with the article. It said that, "the gluteus maximus, the largest muscle in the human body, is primarily engaged only during running. “Your butt is a running muscle; you barely use it when you walk,” Dr. Lieberman said."

I think this must only apply to the male of the species because I've seen women walk and it seems to me that the gluteus maximus is very much in use. However, more observation may be necessary.

For the sake of science, of course. :wink:
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Postby MikeJ » Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:21 am

Here is an article talking about how the human ability to run long distances contributed to their winning out over the rival Neanderthal. Neanderthals were stronger but didn't have the endurance. When the forests of Europe retreated and were replaced by open plains, it gave humans an advantage in hunting game.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/220146
MikeJ
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 7:45 am
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, USA


Return to Outdoors-Related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests