OntarioWeatherService wrote:Who wants a 50% chance of rain forecast? I think the term should say when NWS,Accuweather,TWC says that is
Monday - Cloudy with a we don't have a clue forecast for rain.
So your philosophy is to ignore all uncertainty in a forecast and go with "it will rain" or "it won't rain." Ok, since you know so much, here's a challenge for you. We have a highly amplified upper air pattern setting up for next week. A strong upper level low cuts off from the main jet and retrogrades back towards southern California. Some models indicate it will take more of an inland track which would result in a surface high over the Great Basin. Some indicate it will end up offshore which would put it in a favorable location for rain. Depending on its track, we could be looking at offshore flow OR we could be looking a showers and thunderstorms.
So Kevin, is it going to rain on my cousin's house in Moreno Valley next weekend (21st-23rd)? Note, the question is not "what is the chance that it will rain in the Inland Empire", but specifically "is it going to rain on my cousin's house in Moreno Valley next weekend (21st-23rd)?
When an event is expected to be convective vs stratiform, do you forecast a 100% chance of rain for your entire area even if some (or most) of that area does not see rain? It's easy to say "Yes it will rain" 2 days before a storm, but can you tell someone definitively, "Yes, it will rain at your house" and be right every single time they ask? Not possible. Hence, if you use the "point forecast" that the NWS provides, or the city zip code forecasts provided by people like AccuWeather and weather.com, you will never see 100% chance of rain unless a widespread stratiform rainfall event is expected. But if you think you can do better, I'd like to see you try. The question is not "will it rain" but "where specifically it will rain."