This site,
http://www.vulgarianramblers.org/ca13er ... ssingPeaks, which lists CA peaks over 13k', might well be a good resource. The linked list contains 147 peaks, many of them quite remote, inaccessible and requiring technical skills to summit.
Now that ought to keep anyone busy for a while!
By the way, I have an extra copy of RJ Secor's guide book which is cited on that list. If you'd like a copy, maybe we can barter something or ?
Technical note: The list only contains peaks that rise at least 300 feet above the "key col" (the nearest saddle leading to higher ground). If a peak doesn't rise more than 300 feet above the key col, it may be interesting to climb but it's not considered a separate mountain. For example West San Gorgonio (about 80' above its key col) would not be considered a separate peak for the purposes of this list. Also, many peaks that have names but don't have 300' of "prominence" aren't on this list; just having a name doesn't qualify for this list.
This 300' is somewhat arbitrary. For example, Dragon's Head in the SGW is a fairly prominent peak, BUT it only rises about 280' above its key col. Is it a peak or is it not? At 160', Little Charlton might be a candidate for "de-peaking" as might Alto Diablo at 200'. Surprisingly, Shields Pk has only 160' above its key col and E San Bernardino only 240'. Maybe 200' is more reasonable? Whatever number you use, someone's favorite peak will be "de-peaked," but it's an interesting way to look at what constitutes a peak.