Mt Tyndall 9/5/09

Southern California and far-away places. Hiking, wildlife, cycling etc.

Mt Tyndall 9/5/09

Postby » Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:51 pm

 
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:41 pm

Mt Tyndall

Postby neverwashasbeen » Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:30 pm

Nice hike and then some, way to go. I think your little friend is a pika.
User avatar
neverwashasbeen
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 6:34 am
Location: Palm Springs

good one

Postby halhiker » Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:31 pm

I did Tyndall a few years ago and enjoyed it thoroughly. We were going to do Williamson but after spending the night at Anvil Camp and hiking up to Shepherd's Pass the next AM my buddy wasn't feeling up to it so decided to head down. I knew I wouldn't be able to summit Williamson and get back so I ditched my pack and did Tyndall instead and then hiked back out during an afternoon thunderstorm. It was a fun climb.

Doing the whole thing in a day is awesome! Congratulations.
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Postby » Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:33 pm

Hal, which way did you go up Tyndall?

Williamson looks very intimidating.
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:41 pm

Postby KathyW » Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:38 pm

Ze: Mount Williamson isn't as intimidating as it looks. Take a look at these pictures taken by Bob Burd - they will give you a good idea of what the Class 3 West Face Route (mostly Class 2 with one small Class 3 section) is like:

http://www.snwburd.com/bob/trip_photos/williamson_2/index_t.html

At the same time, Williamson is harder than Tyndall. Not technically harder but just more exhausting.
KathyW
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 6:17 pm

Postby halhiker » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:53 am

Zé wrote:Hal, which way did you go up Tyndall?

Williamson looks very intimidating.


I went up the endless rock hopping Northwest side. It wasn't too hard but I hiked back to the trailhead that day. I think when my buddy say Williamson he knew he didn't feel up to it. It looks big and far.
User avatar
halhiker
 
Posts: 1260
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:00 pm
Location: La Quinta, CA

Postby » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:00 pm

KathyW wrote:Ze: Mount Williamson isn't as intimidating as it looks. Take a look at these pictures taken by Bob Burd - they will give you a good idea of what the Class 3 West Face Route (mostly Class 2 with one small Class 3 section) is like:

http://www.snwburd.com/bob/trip_photos/williamson_2/index_t.html

At the same time, Williamson is harder than Tyndall. Not technically harder but just more exhausting.


well, that's good to know!


halhiker wrote:
Zé wrote:Hal, which way did you go up Tyndall?

Williamson looks very intimidating.


I went up the endless rock hopping Northwest side. It wasn't too hard but I hiked back to the trailhead that day. I think when my buddy say Williamson he knew he didn't feel up to it. It looks big and far.


i happened to head up the north part to where the NW ridge connects, I didn't like the exposure right there.maybe it was just the altitude talking though :o
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:41 pm

Postby tinaballina » Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:06 pm

and to think i missed out on all that elevation gain. nice...:)
User avatar
tinaballina
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Riverside


Return to Outdoors-Related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests