National Forest "Inholdings"?

Non-outdoors topics. News, sports, hobbies, politics, humor.

National Forest "Inholdings"?

Postby Rob » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:27 am

On my San Gorgonio and San Jacinto maps I see shaded areas which I think are "Inholdings". Do National Forest "Inholdings" affect hikers? Are there inholdings in common hiking areas we should avoid? :?:

USGS topo shades "Inholdings" and comments in legend, "Non-National Forest System lands within the National Forest; Inholdings may exist in other National or State reservations".

Forest Service topo marks "Inholdings" and comments, "Private Land within National Forest".

Wikipedia entry tells me, "An inholding is privately owned land inside the boundary of a national park, national forest, state park, or similar publicly-owned protected area. Inholdings result from private ownership of lands prior to the designation of the protected park or forest area, which then end up grandfathered within the legally designated boundary.

"In the United States, the main causes of inholdings are checkerboarding due to railroad land grants under the Pacific Railway Acts beginning in 1862, homestead claims under the 1862 Homestead Act, and mining claims patented under the General Mining Act of 1872, along with the more recent Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971. The railroad checkerboarding primarily affects national forests, while inholdings due to the other types of claims occur frequently within national parks and national forests throughout the western United States. Over the last several decades, conservation groups have lobbied the United States Congress to acquire inholdings especially within designated wilderness areas, either by direct purchase or via land exchange which trades the inholding for other federal lands located outside of national parks or wilderness areas."
Rob
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:59 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Postby Hikin_Jim » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:29 pm

Let me give you a definite "it depends."

Some of the inholdings are just empty land, unfenced and accesible.

Some of the inholdings are actively in use by ranchers, water companies, and mining operations. Generally, these are to be avoided or permission sought prior to entry. Of course sometimes it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission...

While they aren't exactly "inholdings," there are Indian Reservations adjacent or even withing NF boundaries. The Indian Reservation in the SE are of the SG Wilderness is currently closed to hikers.
Backpacking stove reviews and information:  Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
 
Posts: 4938
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: Orange County, CA


Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests