Here are some links to the PSAT governance. They come from the PSAT website, though I could not locate them from the PSAT website itself, and had to use Google.
http://www.pstramway.com/downloads/authority.pdfhttp://www.pstramway.com/msjwpa.htmlThe curious name, Mt. San Jacinto Winter Park, comes from its original justification, winter access to an area suitable for skiing. Ski industry experts debunked that. The Sierra Club fought it, coming up with revenue forecasts that were much less optimistic and proved to be much more accurate than those of the promoters.
It is a special type of California government-linked non-profit corporation. I think you can see from the board membership that it is run by business interests. There are two types of board members, political appointees and others. All the others are identified as local business people, and I am sure the political appointees represent the same interests. Of course, they may not actually run the PSAT. It is not unusual for organizations of this type to be 'captured' - that is the term economists use - by various interests. In this case, I suspect it would be the management. There is certainly no representation for hikers, who are probably regarded by the management as a limited number of low-revenue users.
The competence of the management is a separate issue. I personally doubt they know what they are doing. For example, though we can't be sure yet, it seems likely the toll booth will be a bottleneck. If so, it would not have taken a very expensive or high-powered analysis to predict that. I am also puzzled by their plans to have a 'zip line' - is that what it is called? - in Long Valley. That's an effort to boost traffic. But it seems to me that they are already operating at close to capacity. Since I am retired, I do the trail as often on weekdays as on weekends. Even on weekdays the cars down seem to be operating at close to capacity.