Attitude and responsibility in the wilderness.

General Palm Springs area.

Postby AlanK » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:59 am

Hikin_Jim wrote:I find it very interesting that there's a decline in wilderness visits. Cynthia, do you have a reference that you can point me to? I wonder if there's been any surveying as to why that might be.

Here is a reference to an article that contains data on National Park visits. The conclusions are at least thought-provoking.

Journal of Environmental Management 80 (2006) 387–393

Title: Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices

Authors: Oliver R.W. Pergamsa, Patricia A. Zaradic

Abstract (edited to eliminate symbols that don't reproduce in plain text format)
After 50 years of steady increase, per capita visits to US national parks have declined since 1988. This decline, coincident with the rise in electronic entertainment media, may represent a shift in recreation choices with broader implications for the value placed on biodiversity conservation and environmentally responsible behavior. We compared the decline in per capita visits with a set of indicators representing alternate recreation choices and constraints. The Spearman correlation analyses found this decline in NPV to be significantly negatively correlated with several electronic entertainment indicators: hours of television, video games, home movies, theatre attendance and internet use. There were also significant negative correlations with oil prices, foreign travel, and Appalachian Trail hikers. Income was significantly positively correlated with foreign travel but negatively correlated with national park visits. There was no significant correlation of mean number of vacation days, indicating available vacation time is probably not a factor. Federal funding actually increased during this period, and so was rejected as a probable factor. Park capacity was rejected as limiting since both total overnight stays and visits at the seven most popular parks rose well into the mid-1990s. Aging of baby boomers was also rejected as they are only now reaching retirement age, and thus during the period of visitation decline were still of prime family vacation age. Multiple linear
regression of four of the entertainment media variables as well as oil prices explains 97.5% of this recent decline. We may be seeing evidence of a fundamental shift away from people’s appreciation of nature (biophilia, Wilson 1984) to ‘videophilia,’ which we here define as ‘‘the new human tendency to focus on sedentary activities involving electronic media.’’ Such a shift would not bode well for the future of biodiversity conservation.

If you want a copy of the full article, contact me privately.
User avatar
AlanK
 
Posts: 855
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 7:31 am
Location: Glendale, CA

Postby zippetydude » Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:56 pm

I'm going to email Paris Hilton and ask her to jump right on this after she finishes her current crusade for elephant sobriety. Perhaps she can get some of these old school climbers to wash their rocks more often. Besides, she may find limited success in Africa. Elephants are smart, and in many ways like humans. For example, if I wander across somebody's camp and there's cold beer just sitting there......

All Paris Hilton humor aside, isn't this problem self-correcting anyway?

Scenario 1: "Dude, I hate the wilderness. The rocks are dirty there. I'm staying home and playing video games." Deal!

The wilderness stays cleaner and the wilderness maintains a more intelligent, less self-serving human population.

Scenario 2: "Whoa, I can't get a good grip because the last guy here didn't clean his rocks properly! I'm slipping.....aeeeeiiiiiii!" Thump.

The wilderness stays cleaner and the wilderness maintains a more intelligent, less self-serving human population.

Either way it comes out the same!

That is, unless he's following HikeUp! (HikeUp (regarding your posting above): Well spoken sir. Caught me completely off guard. I admire you for your rock cleaning habits.)

z
User avatar
zippetydude
 
Posts: 2751
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 5:40 am

Postby HikeUp » Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:37 pm

:oops:
HikeUp
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:17 pm
Location: Pasadena, CA

Postby Hikin_Jim » Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:28 pm

zippetydude wrote:... isn't this problem self-correcting anyway?
lol

Well, that's my reaction too sometimes: "Oh, you're going to Vegas this weekend? That's nice..." (... that you're going to leave lots of solitude for me to enjoy in the wilderness). :)

But in the long run, if there are fewer people who care about the wild, there will be fewer people who will go to bat for it when the bulldozers approach.

Not that the Sierra Club is the end all, be all, but I do like their philosophy of running a lot of trips into the wild. Their philosophy is that if you show people how great the wilderness truly is, then people will back you when you take a stand against development and degradation.
Backpacking stove reviews and information:  Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby cynthia23 » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:10 am

Haw haw! Very funny Zippety! But, soberly speaking (that is, when the elephants have gotten to the beer ahead of me), I agree that in general it's not a good thing when people stop visiting national parks, as this means they don't vote to fund them or protect them from development. And the final, inevitable conclusion I draw from all this ... is that I should probably stop bitching about ignoramuses who are crashing around in the wilderness like a bunch of drunken elephants. Even in all their littering, lost, egotistical ways, it's still better that they're there ...
Q: How many therapists does it take to screw in a light bulb? A: Only one, but the light bulb has to want to change ...
cynthia23
 
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:33 pm
Location: Rancho Mirage

Postby Hikin_Jim » Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:24 pm

I know! Let's start an "Adopt a Touron" program. Each of us will be assigned a touron or two and "show 'em the ropes." :)

Well, I'd better not get too big of a head just because I've been in the woods a few more years than someone else. God knows how many times I've done dumb things in the woods (although hopefully nothing too environmentally destructive). Sometimes we don't know until we know. Experience is a great teacher in the wild -- if you live through the lesson. (Yipes, I don't like to think about a couple of close calls I've had)
Backpacking stove reviews and information:  Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
User avatar
Hikin_Jim
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Previous

Return to Mt. San Jacinto & Santa Rosa Mountains

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests